Search
Latest Posts

Complaining about the BCS is one of those go-to topics that makes college football blogging (and really, all college football coverage) tick. The annual calls for change are usually that the computers are too objective (seeing only the stats and scores, not the way teams looked on the field), and the human polls aren't objective enough (regularly prone to bias, apathy and misinformation). 

The USA Today Coaches' Poll in particular is a lightning rod for controversy. Opponents say that the coaches who vote in the poll don't have time to watch every team in the country (or even the Top 25) play, and thus aren't entirely informed. Further, even those that do make an effort would be naturally inclined to overestimate teams in their own conference; after all, these are the guys they're watching on tape each week. 

A great example of Coaches Poll controversy came in 2007, when 11-2 LSU leapt from #7 in the BCS standings to #2 in the final week.  Some timely upsets aided the Tigers, but they also jumped over Virginia Tech (11-2), Georgia (10-2) and Kansas (11-1) in the process.  LSU went on to win the National Championship and prove themselves as deserving of the spot; however, at the time, the final ballots were scrutinized by many, including the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Tony Barnhart

That article (and the revelation that then-New Mexico State coach Hal Mumme chose Hawaii #1 on his final ballot) led two regular college football blogs, Get The Picture and 3rd Saturday in Blogtober, to "do something about it."  Inspired by the godfather of the Air Raid offense, they are attempting to transcend the standard blogosphere criticism and make something truly constructive.  I'll let them explain it:

The Mumme Poll is an ongoing attempt ... to construct a viable method to rank Division 1 college football teams without the bias and potential conflicts of interest that affect other polls, particularly the USA Today Coaches Poll.

How do you eliminate bias in polling for a sport that brings out such passion in everyone involved?  Well, simple, they say: you let everyone vote.

Registration to vote in the Mumme Poll is open to anyone and everyone, provided that you keep it up and don't try any shenanigans (see further rules on their site).  All voters choose their top 12 teams in no particular order, splitting into two groups - the top five and the next seven.  All ballots are compiled and the final poll ranks teams according to how many votes they receive overall, with "top five" votes used to break ties.  As of last week, Alabama (#3 in both human polls) was leading the Mumme Poll by a slim margin.

It may be sports-related, but The Mumme Poll is definitely an exercise for geeks.  I'm already signed up.

Posted in: Sports
Geeks






Archives
December 2017 (3)
November 2017 (14)
October 2017 (12)
September 2017 (12)
August 2017 (14)
July 2017 (22)
June 2017 (18)
May 2017 (16)
April 2017 (13)
March 2017 (11)
February 2017 (10)
January 2017 (20)
December 2016 (10)
November 2016 (11)
October 2016 (22)
September 2016 (25)
August 2016 (24)
July 2016 (27)
June 2016 (22)
May 2016 (20)
April 2016 (23)
March 2016 (24)
February 2016 (22)
January 2016 (18)
December 2015 (8)
November 2015 (16)
October 2015 (19)
September 2015 (30)
August 2015 (20)
July 2015 (24)
June 2015 (26)
May 2015 (31)
April 2015 (21)
March 2015 (25)
February 2015 (18)
January 2015 (13)
December 2014 (16)
November 2014 (13)
October 2014 (21)
September 2014 (33)
August 2014 (22)
July 2014 (32)
June 2014 (31)
May 2014 (20)
April 2014 (18)
March 2014 (14)
February 2014 (20)
January 2014 (23)
December 2013 (12)
November 2013 (16)
October 2013 (29)
September 2013 (26)
August 2013 (21)
July 2013 (23)
June 2013 (18)
May 2013 (39)
April 2013 (23)
March 2013 (33)
February 2013 (21)
January 2013 (22)
December 2012 (18)
November 2012 (17)
October 2012 (28)
September 2012 (20)
August 2012 (22)
July 2012 (38)
June 2012 (28)
May 2012 (31)
April 2012 (22)
March 2012 (33)
February 2012 (27)
January 2012 (13)
December 2011 (17)
November 2011 (15)
October 2011 (23)
September 2011 (24)
August 2011 (26)
July 2011 (33)
June 2011 (17)
May 2011 (34)
April 2011 (19)
March 2011 (18)
February 2011 (16)
January 2011 (11)
December 2010 (16)
November 2010 (12)
October 2010 (19)
September 2010 (12)
August 2010 (16)
July 2010 (16)
June 2010 (5)
May 2010 (2)
April 2010 (4)
March 2010 (3)
February 2010 (8)
January 2010 (5)
December 2009 (3)
November 2009 (3)
October 2009 (4)
September 2009 (1)
August 2009 (4)
July 2009 (4)
June 2009 (2)
May 2009 (4)
April 2009 (3)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (10)
January 2009 (12)
December 2008 (5)
November 2008 (4)
October 2008 (4)
September 2008 (1)
August 2008 (3)
May 2008 (4)
April 2008 (8)
March 2008 (5)
February 2008 (18)
January 2008 (3)
Further archives from 2008 and 2009 are available at the old Wordpress site. Click the logo below to break into the old apartment.